Further, we must focus on sources from different geographical regions, which is a key requirement of diaspora studies. We must be able to look at black life in two or more places and analyze the systems side by side, using the framework of African diaspora theory: dispersal/migration, germination, and community of consciousness. Theorizing about the contemporary African diaspora will be enhanced if we conduct research using these methodologies.

Throughout much of the twentieth century, scholars have used the African diaspora framework to explain the lives of black people around the world. Although they come from different disciplines and ideologies, all of these diaspora scholars call for an understanding of black life as inextricably linked to the brutality of slavery, a global enterprise. If we recognize slavery as a dispersal/sprouting point that is a necessary condition for the black community in the diaspora, then we are on the first platform for diaspora studies. From this platform, scholars need to engage in interdisciplinary research as they talk about the communities of consciousness that diasporas continue to express.

There is evidence that African diaspora theory works when comparing systems of slavery, and there is growing evidence today that these tools work to reveal continuities and divergences between contemporary black diasporas. Theorizing about the African diaspora helps us understand history and literature in more detail. As we continue this line of research around the world, new theories of diaspora will sprout in the academy and take root in scholarly works. Scholars, go to the field and archives and conduct your research using this multivalent theory. There’s a lot of work to be done!

The post Research on the African diaspora appeared first on She Acac.

For Vertovec and Cohen, the diaspora framework explains the multilocality of social and cultural identity formations. The concept of transnationalism provides a framework for understanding how global identities are formed. They caution against applying the term diaspora to communities that were deterritorialized or can be described as transnational. They understand diaspora formation as linked to migration flows. However, nowhere in their six-hundred-page volume can one find a clearly delineated definition of the three concepts. The theorizing of each of these topics of migration, diaspora, and transnationalism is still being developed: “That these three themes are intuitively related is undeniable, but nowhere in their six-hundred-page volume can one find a clearly delineated definition of the three concepts.

African diaspora theory is organic; it evolves, applies, and changes as different scholars take up the study of black people around the world in different eras. Paul Tiyambe Zeleza notes the difficulty in defining the African diaspora (preferring to use the term with a lowercase letter). He writes: “there are several conceptual difficulties in defining the African diaspora; as it simultaneously refers to a process, a condition, a space and a discourse”.

Avtar Brah succinctly presented the tension in using diaspora as an explanatory paradigm. In her monograph Cartographies of the Diaspora, she describes how the use of “diaspora” can be too general: “Its explanatory power [lies] in addressing specific problems associated with transnational movements of people, capital, goods, and cultural iconographies.” Kim D. Butler recognizes these difficulties, but suggests “how” to use the African diaspora framework when studying transnational and contemporary diasporic communities. Butler advocates that scholars use a checklist based on previous theorists’ models and then adapt the checklist to reflect the unique characteristics of people in the diaspora within the study group. Butler identifies some of the problems when scholars have tried to define diaspora by observing the characteristics of individual diasporas and [then] using them as a checklist.”

The post Scientists and the African diaspora appeared first on She Acac.

African diaspora theory provides a framework for understanding the socio-historical experiences of peoples who have been categorized by phenotype or skin color. However, what are the problems associated with categorizing people of African descent into a transnational, historical continuum and then describing communities using the concept of diaspora? First, people in the diaspora do not necessarily accept or use this concept when talking about their own communities. One does not need to identify as an African diaspora person for a concept or theory to be useful. Secondly, sorting peoples into racial categories and assuming that each represents its own history also runs the risk of becoming the worst kind of essentialist doctrine. This paper critiques numerous trends in the conceptualization of the African diaspora,

Simply put, diaspora as a concept can be defined as a community of identity that forms when people move. However, this multi-valued theory has rarely been so simply defined; rather, it has been used to characterize a complex set of circumstances, from individuals who are racially categorized, to oppressed religious or cultural groups, to communities of consciousness, to a whole host of other dispersed groups. The concept of diaspora originated in the Greek language with a certain ambiguity regarding the Greek imperial project of settlement and migration. Subsequently, the concept was applied to the forced migration of Jews from the Holy Land, and our understanding of diaspora became inextricably linked to this “classical” Jewish model of oppression and victimization. today, scholars studying black life and culture in the African diaspora generally use several characteristics in their analysis:
1) dispersal/migration;
2) Germination;
3) Community of consciousness.

The post The concept of the African diaspora appeared first on She Acac.

The everyday consumption habits of Europeans changed due to the new foods supplied by plantation communities in the new world. Sugar and coffee, among other commodities, returned to Europe from the globalization system created by the slave trade. The Europeans who participated in the slave trade-as slave traders, insurance investors, plantation owners, or peripheral workers-were marked by their experience in trading human lives. New communities were formed in the places where slaves were dumped. These communities engaged in a continuous process of reconstruction rather than a static transfer of values and behaviors from their point of origin. In Africa, many communities exhibited different behaviors due to the impact of the slave trade. The global spread of slavery affected people at the point of origin and at the point of resettlement.

Colonial regimes participated in this global trade in goods by moving soldiers, traders, and families around the world, as well as redistributing indigenous populations to other locations. This “imperial diaspora” of dispersed Europeans gave rise to new communities in all corners of the world. In the communities created by Europeans, new variants of slavery, treaties, and hierarchy emerged. These Europeans from the imperial diaspora were not “pure”; they created new patterns of behavior and identity while they remained on the islands, creating “creole” communities among the peoples and places they encountered. The process of identity formation generated by slavery is necessarily “creole”.

Creolization is generally understood as a linguistic phenomenon; however, the concept can be used to study identity formation. Creolization is something that emerges as a collision of languages; it is in the middle between two basic structures. For example, in the so-called creole languages of the Caribbean, you will find West African syntax and grammatical structure superimposed on European words. All languages are combinations of languages and can be considered creolized. Creole is the norm for linguistic patterns and can be useful when applied to the process of identity formation. The descendants of diaspora movements that emerged from slavery (both the imperial diaspora and the African diaspora) have developed their own unique cultures that preserve and often develop their original cultures. These new global diaspora communities may be imbued with some of the same cultural practices as the “original community” (rural communities on the African continent or members of European nation-states), but the original culture should not necessarily be seen as “pure”.

The post A bit of history appeared first on She Acac.